Have a question about this project? For more information on how to download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, we have a guide for that. It only causes problems. If Secure Boot is not enabled, proceed as normal. If you use Rufus to write the same ISO file to the same USB stick and boot in your computer. It does not contain efi boot files. The current release of Slax (slax-64bit-11.2.1.iso) fails to boot using UEFI64 using ventoy with the error message: I don't remember if the shortcut is ctrl i or ctrl r for grub mode. This seem to be disabled in Ventoy's custom GRUB). 4. Yes, at this point you have the same exact image as I have. With ventoy, you don't need to format the disk over and over, you just need to copy the ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI. @pbatard, have you tested it? Can't try again since I upgraded it using another method. Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB Snail LInux , supports UEFI , booting successfully. So I apologise for that. Follow the urls bellow to clone the git repository. 22H2 works on Ventoy 1.0.80. Most likely it was caused by the lack of USB 3.0 driver in the ISO. Follow the guide below to quickly find a solution. When user check the Secure boot support option then only run .efi file with valid signature is select. So I don't really see how that could be used to solve the specific problem we are being faced with here, because, however you plan to use UEFI:NTFS when Secure Boot is enabled, your target (be it Ventoy or something else) must be Secure Boot signed. However, some ISO files dont support UEFI mode so booting those files in UEFI will not work. Yes. The idea that Ventoy users "should know what they are getting into" or that "it's pointless to check UEFI bootloaders for Secure Boot" once Ventoy has been enrolled is disingenuous at best. If you have a faulty USB stick, then youre likely to encounter booting issues. Especially, UEFI:NTFS is not a SHIM, and I don't maintain a set of signatures that I allow binaries signed with through. they reviewed all the source code). It is designed to protect a system against malicious code being loaded and executed early in the boot process, before the operating system has been loaded. The MX21_February_x64.iso seems OK in VirtualBox for me. a media that was created without using Ventoy) running in a Secure Boot environment, so if your point is that because Ventoy uses a means to inject content that Microsoft has chosen not to secure, it makes the whole point of checking Secure Boot useless, then that reasoning logically also applies to official unmodified retail Windows ISOs, because you might as well tell everyone who created a Windows installation media (using the MCT for instance): "There's really no point in having Secure Boot enabled on your system, since someone can just create a Windows media with a malicious Windows\System32\winpeshl.exe payload to compromise your system at early boottime anyway" Again, if someone has Secure Boot enabled, and did not whitelist a third party UEFI bootloader themselves, then they will expect the system to warn them in that third party bootloader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of whether they did enrol a bootloader that chain loaded that third party bootloader. Maybe the image does not suport IA32 UEFI! Results when tested on different models\types of x86 computers - amount of RAM, make/model, latest BIOS? *lil' bow* mishab_mizzunet 1 yr. ago puedes poner cualquier imagen en 32 o 64 bits https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250 Turned out archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64 is not compatible. Menu Option-->Secure Boot Support for Ventoy2Disk.exe and -s option for Ventoy2Disk.sh However, I would say that, if you are already running "arbritrary" code in UEFI mode to display a user message, while Secure Boot is enabled, then you should be able to craft your own LoadImage()/StarImage() that doesn't go through SB validation (by copying the LoadImage()/StarImage() code from the EDK2 and removing the validation part). TPM encryption has historically been independent of Secure Boot. Already on GitHub? The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Please test this ISO file with VirtualMachine(e.g. 1. 5. extservice Earlier (2014-2019) official GRUB in Ubuntu and Debian allowed to boot any Linux kernel, even unsigned one, in Secure Boot mode. I adsime that file-roller is not preserving boot parameters, use another iso creation tool. On the other hand, I'm pretty sure that, if you have a Secure Boot capable system, then firmware manufacturers might add a condition that you can only use TPM-based encryption if you also have Secure Boot enabled, as this can help reduce attack vectors against the TPM (by preventing execution of arbitrary code at the early UEFI boot stage, which may make poking around the TPM easier if it has a vulnerability). As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key, it uses Shim from Fedora (or, more precisely, from Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk). Format NTFS in Windows: format x: /fs:ntfs /q @steve6375 Yes, I finally managed to get UEFI:NTFS Secure Boot signed 2 days ago, and that's part of why there's a new release of Rufus today, that includes the signed version of UEFI:NTFS. Of course, there are ways to enable proper validation. There are two bugs in Ventoy: Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. Extracting the very same efi file and running that in Ventoy did work! And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. 4. Unable to boot properly. You don't need anything special to create a UEFI bootable Arch USB. There are many kinds of WinPE. If someone uses Ventoy with Secure Boot, then Ventoy should not green light UEFI bootloaders that don't comply with Secure Boot. Newbie. I cannot boot into Ventoy with Secure Boot enabled on my machine though, it only boots when I disable Secure Boot in BIOS. Win10_21H2_BrazilianPortuguese_x64.iso also boots fine in Legacy mode on IdeaPad 300 with Ventoy 1.0.57. FFS I just spent hours reinstalling arch just to get this in the end archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64.iso with Ventoy 1.0.47 boots for me on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 UEFI64 boot. Ventoy should only allow the execution of Secure Boot signed I you want to spare yourself some setup headaches, take a USB crafted as a Ventoy or SG2D USB that contains KL ISO files, directly. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Please test and tell your opinion. Feedback is welcome If your tested hardware or image file is not listed here, please tell me and I will be glad to add it to the table here. For example, Ventoy can be modified to somehow chainload full chain of distros shim grub kernel, or custom validation functions could be made, which would, for example, validate and accept files signed with certificates in DB + a set of custom certificates (like ones embedded in distros' Shims), or even validate and automatically extract Shims embedded certificates and override EFI validation functions (as it's done currently to completely disable validation), but is this kind of complexity worth it for a USB boot utility which is implemented to be simple and convenient? I've tried Debian itself, Kubuntu, NEON, and Proxmox, and all freeze after being selected in the Ventoy menu. I was just objecting to your claim that Secure Boot is useless when someone has physical access to the device, which I don't think is true, as it is still (afaik) required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. Would be nice if this could be supported in the future as well. No boot file found for UEFI (Arch installation) - reddit unsigned .efi file still can not be chainloaded. Heck, in the absolute, if you have the means (And please note here that I'm not saying that any regular Joe, who doesn't already have access to the whole gammut of NSA resources, can do it), you can replace the CPU with your own custom FPGA, and it's pretty much game over, as, apart from easy to defeat matters such as serial number check, your TPM will be designed to work with anything that remotely looks like a CPU, and if you communicate with it like a CPU would, it'll happily help you access whatever data you request such as decrypted disk content. It works for me if rename extension to .img - tested on a Lenovo IdeaPad 300. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and My guesd is it does not. Still having issues? arnaud. 8 Mb. In that case there's no difference in booting from USB or plugging in a SATA or NVMe drive with the same content as you'd put on USB (and we can debate about intrusion detection if you want). By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and Firstly, I run into the MOKManager screen and enroll the testkey-ventoy.der and reboot. Ventoy does not always work under VBox with some payloads. In Ventoy I had enabled Secure Boot and GPT. Ventoy just create a virtual cdrom device based on the ISO file and chainload to the bootx64.efi/shim.efi inside the ISO file. 3. Indeed I have erroneously downloaded memtest v4 because I just read ".iso" and went for it. It was actually quite the struggle to get to that stage (expensive too!) Any way to disable UEFI booting capability from Ventoy and only leave legacy? This filesystem offers better compatibility with Window OS, macOS, and Linux. Its ok. How to mount the ISO partition in Linux after boot ? They do not provide a legacy boot option if there is a fat partition with an /EFI folder on it. @rderooy try to use newest version, I've been trying on a Dell XPS 13 9360 with Ventoy 1.0.34 UEFI running and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso does not work. So, I'm trying to install Arch, but after selecting Arch from Ventoy I keep getting told that "No Bootfile found for UEFI! sharafat.pages.dev Many thanks! For Hiren's BootCD HBCD_PE_x64.iso has been tested in UEFI mode. Remain what in the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe . When it asks Delete the key (s), select Yes. screenshots if possible I have a solution for this. Users enabled Secure Boot to be warned if a boot loader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of where that bootloader is executed from. BIOS Mode Both Partition Style GPT Disk . Yeah, I think UEFI LoadImage()/StarImage(), which is what you'd call to chain load the UEFI bootloader, are set to validate the loaded image for Secure Boot and not launch it for unsigned/broken images, if Secure Boot is enabled (but I admit I haven't formally validated that). Already on GitHub? 1. ia32 . Ventoy Cantt load some ISOs - Ventoy @ventoy I can confirm this, using the exact same iso. Therefore, unless Ventoy makes it very explicit that "By enrolling Ventoy for Secure Boot, you understand that you are also granting anyone with the capability of running non Secure Boot enabled boot loaders on your computer, including potential malicious ones that would otherwise have been detected by Secure Boot", I will maintain that there is a rather important security issue that needs to be addressed. Fix them with this tool: If the advices above haven't solved your issue, your PC may experience deeper Windows problems. If a user whitelists Ventoy using MokManager, it's because they want the Ventoy bootloader to run in a Secure Boot environment and want it to only chain load boot loaders that meet the Secure Boot requirements. snallinux-.6-x86_64.iso - 1.40 GB Astra Linux , supports UEFI , booting successfully. No bootfile found for UEFI! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5NFuDCZQ00 This means current is ARM64 UEFI mode. Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. What's going on here? New version of Rescuezilla (2.4) not working properly. I can guarantee you that if you explain the current situation to the vast majority of Ventoy users who enrolled it in a Secure Boot environment, they will tell you that this is not what they expected at all and that what they want, once enrolled, is for Ventoy to only let through UEFI boot loaders that can be validated for Secure Boot and produce the expected Secure Boot warning for the ones that don't. It woks only with fallback graphic mode. Please refer: About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE. I will give more clear warning message for unsigned efi file when secure boot is enabled. plzz help. You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). Boots, but cannot find root device. That's actually the whole reason shims exist, because Microsoft forbade Linux people to get their most common UEFI boot manager signed for Secure Boot, so the Linux community was forced into creating a separate non GPLv3 boot loader that loads GRUB, and that can be signed for Secure Boot. It gets to the root@archiso ~ # prompt just fine using first boot option. Yes. This software will repair common computer errors, protect you from file loss, malware, hardware failure and optimize your PC for maximum performance. @chromer030 hello. About Secure Boot in UEFI mode - Ventoy Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. wifislax64-2.1-final.iso - 2 GB, obarun-JWM-2020.03.01-x86_64.iso - 1.6 GB, MiniTool_Partition_Wizard_10.2.3_Technician_WinPE.iso - 350 MB, artix-cinnamon-s6-20200210-x86_64.iso - 1.88 GB, Parrot-security-4.8_x64.iso - 4.03 GB Could you please also try via BIOS/Legacy mode? Because if I know you ever used Ventoy in a Secure Boot enabled environment, I can now run any malicious payload I want at the UEFI level, on your computer. *far hugh* -> Covid-19 *bg*. 1.0.80 actually prompts you every time, so that's how I found it. Hi, Gentoo LiveDVD doesn't work, when I try to boot it, It's showing up the GRUB CLI So as @pbatard said, the secure boot solution is a stopgap and that's why Ventoy is still at 1.0.XX. Even though I copied the Windows 10 ISO to flash drive, which presumably has a UEFI boot image on it, neither of my Vostros would recognize it. The error sits 45 cm away from the screen, haha. Please thoroughly test the archive and give your feedback, what works and what don't. It looks like that version https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33 fixes issue with my thinkpad. | 5 GB, void-live-x86_64-20191109-xfce.iso | 780 MB, refracta10-beta5_xfce_amd64-20200518_0033.iso | 800 MB, devuan_beowulf_3.0.0_amd64_desktop-live.iso | 1.10 GB, drbl-live-xfce-2.6.2-1-amd64.iso | 800 MB, kali-linux-2020-W23-live-amd64.iso | 2.88 GB, blackarch-linux-live-2020.06.01-x86_64.iso | 14 GB, cucumber-linux-1.1-x86_64-basic.iso | 630 MB, BlankOn-11.0.1-desktop-amd64.iso | 1.8 GB, openmamba-livecd-en-snapshot-20200614.x86_64.iso | 1.9 GB, sol-11_3-text-x86.iso | 600 MB Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI." UEFI64 Bootfile \EFI\Boot\bootx64.efi is present. may tanong po ulit ako yung pc ko po " no bootfile found for uefi image does not support x64 uefi" i am using ventoy galing po sa linux ko, gusto ko po isang laptop ko gawin naman windows, ganyan po lagi naka ilang ulit na po ako, laptop ko po kasi ayaw na bumalik sa windows mula nung ginawa ko syang linux, nagtampo siguro kaya gusto ko na po ibalik sa windows salamat po sa makakasagot at sa . Then your life is simplified to Persistence management while each of the 2 (Ventoy or SG2D) provide the ability to boot Windows if it is installed on any local . ***> wrote: And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. How to Create a Multiboot USB With Ventoy - MUO - Technology, Simplified. Again, it doesn't matter whether you believe it makes sense to have Secure Boot enabled or not. All the .efi/kernel/drivers are not modified. fails to find system in /slax, 'Hello System' os can boot successfully with bootx64.efi's machine and show desktop. It's the BIOS that decides the boot mode not Ventoy. if it's possible please add UEFI support for this great distro. Point 4 from Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements states: Code submitted for UEFI signing must not be subject to GPLv3 or any license that purports to give someone the right to demand authorization keys to be able to install modified forms of the code on a device. Sorry for the late test. I guess this is a classic error 45, huh? access with key cards) making sure that your safe does get installed there, so that it should give you an extra chance to detect ill intentioned people trying to access its content. legacy - ok This will disable validation policy override, making Secure Book work as desired: it will load only signed files (+ files signed with SHIM MOK key). ParagonMounter @BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' Acronis True Image 2020 24.6.1 Build 25700 in Legacy is working in Memdisk mode on 1.0.08 beta 2 but on another older Version of Acronis 2020 sometimes is boot's up but the most of the time he's crashing after loading acronis loader text. 4 Ways to Fix Ventoy if It's Not Working [Booting Issues] In Windows, some processes will occupy the USB drive, and Ventoy2Disk.exe cannot obtain the control right of the USB drive, so that the device cannot be listed. What you want is for users to be alerted if someone picked a Linux or Microsoft media, and the UEFI bootloader was altered from the original. Any kind of solution? However, after adding firmware packages Ventoy complains Bootfile not found. always used Archive Manager to do this and have never had an issue. So, yeah, if you have access to to the hardware, then Secure Boot, TPM or whatever security measure you currently have on consumer-grade products, is pretty much useless because, as long as you can swap hardware components around, or even touch the hardware (to glitch the RAM for instance), then unless the TPM comes with an X-Ray machine that can scan and compare hardware components, you're going to have a very hard time plugging all the many holes through which a dedicated attacker can gain access to your data. DSAService.exe (Intel Driver & Support Assistant). You signed in with another tab or window. Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' What exactly is the problem? Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. Windows 10 32bit only support IA32 efi, your machine may be x86_64 uefi (amd64 uefi), so this distro can't boot and will show this message. A Multiboot Linux USB for PC Repair | Page 135 - GBAtemp.net All of these security things are there to mitigate risks. Option 1: doesn't support secure boot at all I'll test it on a real hardware a bit later. If so, please include aflag to stop this check from happening! The iso image (prior to modification) works perfectly, and boots using Ventoy. No bootfile found for UEFI! Issue #313 ventoy/Ventoy GitHub I tested Manjaro ISO KDE X64. To create a USB stick that is compatible with USB 3.0 using the native boot experience of the Windows 10 Technical Preview media (or Windows 8/Windows 8.1), use DiskPart to format the USB stick and set the partition to active, then copy all of the files from inside the ISO . Vmware) with UEFI mode and to confirm that the ISO file does support UEFI mode. Also tested on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 16GB OK (UEFI64). @adrian15, could you tell us your progress on this? Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. Keeping Ventoy and ISO files updated can help avoid any future booting issues with Ventoy. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation. Select "Partition scheme" as MBR (Master Boot Record) and "File system" as NTFS. Thank you! If you burn the image to a CD, and use a USB CD drive, I bet you find it will install fine. I've been trying to do something I've done a milliion times before: This has always worked for me. A lot of work to do. Ventoy When install Ventoy, maybe an option for user to choose. The thing is, the Windows injection that Ventoy usse can be applied to an extracted ISO (i.e. Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. I've tested it with Microsoft-signed binaries, custom-signed binaries, ubuntu ISO file (which chainloads own shim grub signed with Canonical key) all work fine. Set the VM to UEFI mode and connect the ISO file directly to the VM and boot. Let the user access their computer (fat chance they're going to remove the heatsink and thermal paste to see if their CPU was changed, especially if, as far as they are concerned, no change as occurred and both the computer appearance and behaviour are indistinguishable from usual). An encoding issue, perhaps (for the text)? I'll think about it and try to add it to ventoy. Inspection of the filesystem within the iso image shows the boot file(s) - including the UEFI bootfile - in the respective directory. Finally, click on "64-bit Download" and it will start downloading Windows 11 from Microsoft's server. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI. Then congratulations: You have completely removed any benefits of using Secure Boot for any person who enrolled Ventoy on their Secure Boot computer. It supports x86 Legacy BIOSx86 Legacy BIOS,x86_64 UEFIx86_64 UEFI, ARM64 UEFI, IA32 UEFI and MIPS64EL UEFI. @ventoy used Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk files to disable UEFI file policy, that's the easiest way, but not a 'proper' one. Background Some of us have bad habits when using USB flash drive and often pull it out directly. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added some ISO's files : I'm afraid I'm very busy with other projects, so I haven't had a chance. Do I still need to display a warning message? check manjaro-gnome, not working. I'd be interested in a shim for Rufus as well, since I have the same issue with wanting UEFI:NTFS signed for Secure Boot, but using GRUB 2 code for the driver, that makes Secure Boot signing it impossible. Sorry for my ignorance. Won't it be annoying? The main point of Secure Boot is to prevent (or at least warn about) the execution of bootloaders that have not been vetted by Microsoft or one of the third parties that Microsoft signed a shim for (such as Red Hat). Although it could be disabled on all typical motherboards in UEFI setup menu, sometimes it's not easily possible e.g. However, per point 12 of the link I posted above, requirements for becoming a SHIM provider are a lot more stringent than for just getting a bootloader signed by Microsoft, though I'm kind of hoping that storing EV credentials on a FIPS 140-2 security key such as a Yubico might be enough to meet them. Thank you The virtual machine cannot boot. and that is really the culmination of a process that I started almost one year ago. Boots, but unable to find its own files; specifically, does not find boot device and waits user input to find its root device. If you do not see a massive security problem with that, and especially if you are happy to enrol the current version of Ventoy for Secure Boot, without realizing that it actually defeats the whole point of Secure Boot because it can then be used to bypass Secure Boot altogether, then I will suggest that you spend some time reading into trust chains. I installed ventoy-1.0.32 and replace the .efi files. Haven't tried installing it on bare metal, but it does install to a VM with the LabConfig bypasses. Again, I think it is very fair to say that, if you use use Ventoy on a Secure Boot enabled system, and you went through Ventoy Secure Boot enrolment, they you expect that ISOs that aren't Secure Boot compliant will be reported, as they would with other means of using them on that system. This ISO file doesn't change the secure boot policy. Oh and obviously, once that is done, Ventoy will need to make sure that it's not possible to run an older versions of it, in a Secure Boot environment where a newer version has been enrolled, as it would still defeat the whole thing. Well occasionally send you account related emails. Ventoy is able to chain boot Windows 10 (build 2004) just fine on the same systems. I think it's OK. chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin fails to boot on BIOS & UEFI. Some questions about using KLV-Airedale - Page 9 - Puppy Linux @ventoy However, users have reported issues with Ventoy not working properly and encountering booting issues. SecureBoot - Debian Wiki unsigned .efi file still can not be chainloaded. This is definitely what you want. For instance, if you download a Windows or Linux ISO, you sure want to find out if someone altered the official bootloader, that was put there by the people who created the ISO, because it might tell you if something was maliciously inserted there. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. Can't install Windows 7 ISO, no install media found ? So, this is debatable. If Ventoy was intended to be used from an internal hard disk, I would agree with you, but Ventoy is a USB-based multiboot solution and therefore the user must have physical access to the system, so it is the users responsibility to be careful about what he inserts into that USB port. ", same error during creating windows 7 I remember that @adrian15 tried to create a sets of fully trusted chainload chains Option 3: only run .efi file with valid signature. I'll try looking into the changelog on the deb package and see if Tried the same ISOs in Easy2Boot and they worked for me. Must hardreset the System. For example, GRUB 2 is licensed under GPLv3 and will not be signed. Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi . I still don't know why it shouldn't work even if it's complex. Most of modern computers come with Secure Boot enabled by default, which is a requirement for Windows 10 certification process. Secure Boot was supported from Ventoy 1.0.07, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh. You can use these commands to format it: Paragon ExtFS for Windows downloaded from: http://old-dos.ru/dl.php?id=15030. Extra Ventoy hotkey features: F1 or 1 - load the payoad file into memory first (useful for some small DOS and Linx ISOs). I would assert that, when Secure Boot is enabled, every single time an unsigned bootloader is loaded, a warning message should be displayed. Don't get me wrong, I understand your concerns and support your position. same here on ThinkPad x13 as for @rderooy I can confirm it was the reason for some ISOs to not boot (ChimeraOS, Manjaro Gnome). This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it? Can't say for others, but I made Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk with that exact purpose: to bypass Secure Boot validation policy. Then I can directly add them to the tested iso list on Ventoy website. , Laptop based platform: Does the iso boot from a VM as a virtual DVD? Another issue about Porteus and Aporteus : if we copy ISO via dd or other tools or copy ISO contents to EFI partition of USB work perfectly in UEFI. In Linux, you need to specify the device to install Ventoy which can be a USB drive or local disk. I tested live GeckoLinux STATIC Plasma 152 (based on openSUSE) with ventoy-1.0.15. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. Agreed. Hope it would helps, @ventoy I still have this error on z580 with ventoy 1.0.16. The only way to make Ventoy boot in secure boot is to enroll the key. Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. Hopefully, one of the above solutions help you fix Ventoy if its not working, or youre experiencing booting issues. Besides, you can try a linux iso file, for example ubuntu-20.04-desktop-amd64.iso, I have the same for Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso but works fine with netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso and HBCD_PE_x64.iso (v1.0.1) Lenovo Ideapad Z580. You need to make the ISO UEFI64 bootable. In a fit of desperation, I tried another USB drive - this one 64GB instead of 8GB. You can open the ISO in 7zip and look for yourself. @ValdikSS, I'm afraid I am fairly busy right now and, technically for me, investing time on this can be seen as going towards helping a "competing" product (since I am the creator of Rufus, though I genuinely don't have a problem with healthy competition and I'm quite happy to direct folks, who've been asking to produce a version of Rufus with multiboot for years, to use Ventoy instead), whereas I could certainly use that time to improve my own software .
Somerset County Maine Police Log,
Upcoming Autograph Signings 2022,
Articles V
