leica m240 vs m262 image quality

I think everyone gave great suggestions, I went with a new 262, love the shutter and simplicity compared to the 240. That said, I dont shoot Leicas for rapidity.Start Up. Additionally, I really like the simplified look and small upgrades the MP versions offer. The colour differences between the two are due to slightly different colour handling in the camera and can be cancelled out completely by the camera profiles in LR. Using an M this way does not give me the same fundamental photography pleasure as the M8 or M-9P do, but, what it does give me is the ability to scratch the inevitable itch that eventually comes to every M8/9/ME user the desire to use their M for other tasks theirs just cannot do (macro work, adapting other lenses for example). Of course there will be technological advances and all kinds of new features. Every other brand talks about new improved this, and added or increased that. Whats the best camera for around $2000? This can make the process of rationalising an upgrade quite difficult, though in my experience once the upgrade is made, it does tend to make a bit more sense. Unfortunately, this isnt something thats fixed by the M10 either though I am definitely looking forward to how much the M10 improves manual ISO control for me. Ive turned off the automatic image review and hardly ever needto go through the menu - and for the few times that I do so I appreciate the very simple menu structure so its easy to find what Im after. Great Image quality (warmer than M-10, looks more like M-9 CCD image rendering). My GAS was satisfied with a Z6 with the M-to-Z adapter. However it is nice to have a brand new camera and if you can manage without Liveview most M262 users seem very happy with it. Im not going to go into details here to be honest. A stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external microphone. I decided that I wanted to keep the one camera that can do close to everything I need in the digital world (and for me, this includes personal and occasional professional work, mostly product still photography, but also videography). I hadnt noticed that it focused closer though. Thanks!These new Nikons look fairly amazing I do wish theyd been quicker to market though!M10 review I guess it depends on how much it inspires a post out of me its the first new Leica Digital camera Ive ever bought, and with it being new/current, I might try and squeeze something out sooner rather than later. Shooting with the Leica M262 in manual ISO takes 3 commands to change and set the ISO. I upgraded to the M240 from an M9, had it for 3 months and went back to an M9. Clear editor. Indeed, I am an m10 owner who misses my m9. With AF tracking, once you choose the subject and press the shutter release part way down, as the subject moves, the autofocus will follow it. In the run up to buying an M10 Ive been reading a lot of reviews, and have found the M262 is rarely mentioned in them. Hello Hamish,Great writeup. For me and my tastes though, the Leica M262 does feel like an advancement from the M240. I love the colors from the sensor as a whole, but one thing I dont like is rendering of skin tones. I realised Id only used it once in the last 6 months. Paste as plain text instead, I just bought a M262.Its my 3rd Leica M (after a M6 and a M240) and each time I come back to a M, its a delight. But nope, they included a hardly useful flourish, that as you say, looks like it was thought up but a marketing department. My M8 is still around for those who are wondering. Fortunately, whilst the control of ISO isnt quite perfect, I have found the way exposure compensation works on the Leica M262 to be a big step up from the M9. Can you compare side by side, please? More battery power can be an indication of longer battery life. I like Roger a lot hes written for this site before, and we chatted a fair bit around the time. Ive read all too often from M10 owners how much they miss an M9 or M8 variant because of the simplicity and CCD image quality. That said, the real joy is in how little even the two screens of options in the main menu need to be used. It was un-important to me; I own an M 262. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. p.s. Bringing up the live-view display gave me what appeared to my taste to be a quite unpleasant representation of the world in front of the camera. Without even thinking about it, I started using the live-view. Adjusting colours always feels like a headache, but is one Ive broadly avoided with this camera. Early M3 models featured a double-stroke lever, meaning it required two strokes to advance to the next frame of film and cock the shutter. Otherwise, the two cameras are similar since the 262 is really just a pared-down version of the 240 and if its mainly the rangefinder experience that you are after then you cant go wrong with either. The body is pretty well weather sealed. In short, I generally find myself not needing to tweak the colours at all from the M262, which is something I quite appreciate. I find it very quick. You'd be wise to buy the best/latest digital body you can afford and leave a healthy budget for the best/most lenses possible. And so I had to do a paradoxical thing. But even this hasnt really bothered me too much it might be a little clumsy what with the need to press 3 buttons when you want to change ISO, but the way the auto ISO works pretty much makes up for it. If you intend to use lenses wider than 28mm or longer than 135mm Liveview and EVF are very useful, also macro photography is much easier (essential with the new 90mm macro lens and macro adapter) or if you need video. The better a device's color depth the more color nuances it can distinguish. Any help you learned people would be able to give me as to M240 vs M262 and a good lenswould be invaluable and very much appreciated. The fix is to remove the bottom plate and remove the battery, but this is not a solution for when the decisive moment is at hand.Low Light Performance. Itd be a waste of time when you can go and find other reviews that no doubt do high ISO comparisons with other brands of cameras etc. Now, I should just say at this point that when I first got my Leica M262 I found the exact opposite. I have an M246 where just holding down the ISO button, turning the thumbwheel to change it then releasing does the job. . Although I know right from the gate that my M-P Typ 240 wont get as much use as my new heart winning M9-P, it will however keep me from having that inevitable internal debate of owning just one old or new M body. Pasted as rich text. Turns out that was bollocks too! Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come. Bluetooth is a wireless technology that allows you to easily transfer data between different devices, such as smartphones, tablets and computers. ins.style.display='block';ins.style.minWidth=container.attributes.ezaw.value+'px';ins.style.width='100%';ins.style.height=container.attributes.ezah.value+'px';container.appendChild(ins);(adsbygoogle=window.adsbygoogle||[]).push({});window.ezoSTPixelAdd(slotId,'stat_source_id',44);window.ezoSTPixelAdd(slotId,'adsensetype',1);var lo=new MutationObserver(window.ezaslEvent);lo.observe(document.getElementById(slotId+'-asloaded'),{attributes:true}); The fact is, I really like them as cameras, but largely speaking they just function for me. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didn't need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. Ive decided to sell my Leica M typ 262, so I thought it about time I write a bit of a post about it. I really have found it quite distracting to have an image preview thats different to what Im used to, especially since its both inaccurate and in a way thats unappealing to my tastes. This made me think; maybe I could get on with the video features too? Versus uses cookies to improve your experience on the site. That said, I do miss the live view feature. It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M . The fact that Ive somehow managed to rationalise my way out of that opinion doesnt change how good the M262 really is, and indeed how well suited to me I once felt it to be. To each his own. The M240 is a great camera that produces gorgeous images but you are undoubtedly going to love the M10. The Leica M262 (and M240 or any other current M as of July of 2016) seems more like a bridge between the past and what could be the future of Leica. As @Jeff Skindly pointed out (when I asked about the M262), this might be a better place to seek views and opinions on this model. Quite possibly because my camera at the time didnt have it as a feature, I denied that I would ever find it useful. USA Distributor of MCM Equipment leica m240 vs m262 image quality Usability is great (with some of the limitations you mentioned), and image quality of the 262 is certainly superb, and the main reason (aside from usability and a good sensor), at least for me, the Leica M glass, is a topic somebody else can cover much better than I can. The Leica M262 feels to me like almost everything anyone could or should expect from a digital Leica rangefinder. Compared Usage Recommendations More. A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. The camera becomes entirely unresponsive. I drive a 15 year old car for example, dont buy clothes often, have one pair of shoes, etc. My budget is c. 3,000 for the camera and lens. So its not a financial burden to have it around, and selling it wont yield me that much cash, and I have no desire to sell it anyways since its my favorite M of all time that still serves some legitimate purpose. I wish I could afford him moreI often find myself agreeing with him too. Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. This is exiting news in so many ways that I will now test your patience for a few minutes in trying to explain it. The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken. I missed his musings in AP. Something about the idea that it had all these weird and wonderful features made me expect a camera that felt different. CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies. Image quality is exceptionally good across the native ISO range, the weight has been decreased substantially, and . Leaving aside the video recording, the main difference is the simplified menu of the 262 v the live view of the 240. After the M11 released though, used prices of the M10 dropped and I decided to get one. Although it may be possible to choose among other frame rates, those recordings usually have lower resolutions. I love the M240, didn't feel to switch to the M10. With regards to minimizing my digital camera gear, my thinking was simple. Image: Leica. I guess that how much I miss the live-view will define how soon, if at all, I start saving my pennies for a swap. In case you're confused, the M240 was the camera that followed the Leica M9. This page is currently only available in English. Theres very little real difference between the two cameras so it really depends on what you can find to suit your budget - I certainly wouldnt hold out for one if you can find the other in decent condition. The number of megapixels determines the resolution of the images captured with the main camera. BECOME A MEMBER to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMbqwh98qO5wWowtQjIK8ig/joinEXCLUSIVE PRESETS FOR IMAGES CAPTURED WITH LEICA CAMERAS:. That being said, this is pretty much everything I want from a digital camera or any sort of camera for that matter. An electronic viewfinder (EVF) with a higher resolution provides a sharper image, producing a view comparable in quality with the one displayed on an optical viewfinder. I use it for mostly personal/travel type shooting, with the occasional casual paid shoot. RE: the ISO issue. Manage Settings Hi everyone. In practice, this has translated into me being able to shoot it for a lot longer without having to think about changing or charging the battery. Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Last year I got the 262 and had been quite pleased with it. Thanks a lot for your replies. Thanks for the insights Louis! Having run the gamut of all the Ms, Ive settled on these two as my main M system and I suggest to others who cant shake the M bug to do something similar. Yeah, I edit all my digital images, so I guess I dont really think about that. In one of his editorial pieces in Amateur Photographer he applauds this philosophy. Display as a link instead, Then I bought an early mirrorless camera possibly a Panasonic or Sony, I cant remember which came first and I had to eat a load of humble pie. Thanks, James. If live view/video is a don't care then buy the lower cost camera. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Without a magnifier piece.comfortable view is 50-35mm. Id probably buy a new car. All features aside, my lust was triggered by the drastic reduction in size. A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos. After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts. In fact, I caught myself using it a number of times without thinking. Completely agree I really thought thats what they were going to do. It's slightly lighter than the 240 and I have no use for video nor live view in a Leica. That said, even in the short time Ive owned a Leica M240, its confused me with what seems like an obvious short coming, changed my mind about one feature that I had written of as pretty much useless to me, proved that another one of its highlight features is indeed something I have no interest in, and perhaps unfortunately (since I cant afford one) left me with big a chunk of Leica M10 GAS. They arent rangefinder coupled past 1m, but nonetheless they do focus that close. This page contains all hands-on, detailed Camera Reviews that have been published at Photography Life. This means the image will be stabilised regardless of what lens is being used. For me, theres no place for a comment like Peras. Here is a quickreview and comparison for the Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 rangefinder cameras. The new Leica M is the most innovative and versatile M-Camera that the modern M-System has ever created. And if you find the viewfinder better, as many report. Leica has used the button space on the rear of the camera that is used for live view in the Typ 240 to . All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982023 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. Controls feel well balanced and satisfyingly precise. ), and Im now looking to part with the Leica M240 and put the money back into my business (where I borrowed it from). - Leica M 262 & Voigtlnder 50/1.2. I use 3rd generation Sony A7 cameras with a cage and a big hand grip with a mic and an Atomos Ninja V external screen bolted to it. One has a brightline window, the other does not. (they really have me suckered in dont they?!). what a great text, and great pictures, thank you! The higher the movie recording bitrate the better the movie quality with more and crispier details and less compression artifacts. Just feels like the marketing department have taken over the machine room, unfortunately. Ultimately, if youre looking for all the bells and whistles, you certainly wont find them on this camera. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens. Source: DxOMark. The Leica M9/ M8 B&W JPEGs can be created 95-99% in camera and I would say my black and white film images are 88% in camera/film developing, 2% scanning, 10% in computer to remove dust and do any basic darkroom style adjustments. As I talk about in my M9 review, the screen on that camera really is very crap, so this did feel like a big enough deal to make the jump. (Leica M (Typ 262)), Unknown. This includes the M10-R, M10-P, M10 Monochrom, M10, and M10-D from the current generation, as well as the M (Typ 240), M-P (Typ 240), M (Typ 262), M-D (Typ 262) and the M Monochrom (Typ 246) from the prior generation. Using it in this factory, a space where I needed to be aware of the timing of things that were happening around me, it just clicked for me. The obvious take-away from the third image set is just how poorly the Leica M246 and Leica M Monochrom renders overexposed highlights. For example, I am in a coffee shop with the camera sitting on a Manfrotto table top tripod. Survey: Third-party Lenses for Leica M-Mount , Umfrage: Dritthersteller Objektive fr Leica M-Mount . has a removable battery. There are two things to be separated here. Privacy policy. Good thing, I don't need to upgrade further, as those are plenty enough for many years to come. My primary reasons for upgrading were: better high ISO capabilities ie. I dont have and 6-bit coded lenses, or really bother with the coding, so just tend to set the minimum speed to 1/60th. I have had good luck with Sonys latest fast SD cards, improving this condition quite well. Of all the mentioned digital rangefinders, I enjoyed the [], [] is a definite yes! To be fair, about 30 days of the last six months had the Leica in intensive care at Leica New Jersey so this is technically five months with the M262. I shoot with 35mm and 50mm lenses. The sensor is still not what I would consider great (or even competitive) in regards to dynamic range and high ISO quality, perhaps I was just spoiled by the incredible capabilities of the Nikon Df. As mentioned, one of the big selling points Leica hung their marketing angle off when launching the Leica M262 was the reduction of menu options to 2 screens compared to the M240. Dont get me wrong Hamish, if I didnt have to give the Taxman an additional sum equal to a Leica M10 last Spring, Id have been tempted! A personal taste thing of course, but youd think that a Leica camera would have a screen that was at least mostly accurate to the end photo? This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash. Afternoon all and best wishes for a happy 2021! This really piqued my interest. When I was looking at replacing my M9 with a newer model which I did in large part for the benefit of a better screen on the back I chose to skip the Leica M240 due to the fact that I didnt feel like the swathe of features it had compared to the later M262 offered me any advantage. Help us by suggesting a value. JPG Settings can be on the user assignable first screen and from that quickly turn on/off Monochrome. Then out of curiosity, I've bough at fair price ( sh price dropped when M10 came, I couldn't resist) former digital Ms (M240, M-D, M246). Find a comparison between different fujifilm x30 vs x100t. Same settings, same ISO of 320, etc. As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason I went for the M262 instead of the M240 when I was looking to replace my M9. I turned off automatic review and theres no chimping, and with an ISO dial I dont even need to use any buttons throughout a shoot. I think, at least, Ive not tried one either . The M10 has the new ISO wheel on the top left. I am sure you have seen the funny Video of Kai Wong:https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, I have indeed, thanks, I shall take another look its been a while!Sounds like youve made a good choice!I have recently picked up a TL to use along side the forthcoming M10 they both use the same Visoflex, Im going to take the charitable route here but Pera Detlics comment may be interpreted as Leicas are expensive and Pera doesnt have the matching skill set to justify buying one.I also feel that way. Basically, Im sold on live-view these days but, despite this fact, I didnt think it would appeal to me on a Leica. You shouldnt be so hard on yourself, Pera. A phase-detection autofocus system is faster than a contrast detection autofocus system. We were perfectly happy in the film days when KODAK or FUJI(film) updated our sensor with a new emulsion. Some cards are woefully slow. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. When it comes to making video, things are different! I drive a 15 year old car for example, dont buy clothes often, have one pair of shoes, etc. Its been that camera that I know is there and just crack out when it feels right. On 12/27/2020 at 11:24 AM, a.noctilux said: On 12/27/2020 at 12:24 PM, a.noctilux said: Survey: Third-party Lenses for Leica M-Mount , Umfrage: Dritthersteller Objektive fr Leica M-Mount , https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. The M240 is a camera where perhaps 50% of the image is created in camera, 50% in computer. But the M9 for me has so many characteristics, beyond specs, iso performance or touchscreen blah blah blah. Cheers! Source: DxOMark. Compared to the M9 Ive found less of a problem with magenta shift, especially in skin tones, though its fair to say the bias is still toward magenta as opposed the the green bias I found in my Sonys especially the older and cheapest ones that had frankly horrible colour-science. I do think the 262 files have an edge over the 240. And sometimes they could come in handy. Selling the M262, a camera that I purchased for its pure simplicity; and keeping the Z6, a camera that I purchased for its many features (including live view, a hybrid camera with fantastic video capabilities including full frame 4K, compatibility with my Profoto strobes, owning quite a bit of Nikon F-mount glass, auto-focus, etc.)! I'm not sure if it's ok to show a snapshot of the LFI article. The build quality of the M 262 is impeccable. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_17',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); Overall, these changes made the move from the M9 to M262 feel greater than the sum of their parts. The price is$5195/4050. Leica M (Typ 262) The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken. The resulting image will have less quality than when staying within the native ISO range, but it can be useful in certain situations. At 0.68 magnification itll be hard to push to 75mm without a magnifier eyepiece x1.25 or x1.4. The 262 probably has a more stable power management, resulting in less banding and thus better high ISO performance. It happened with the M8,M9, more recently the M240 and now the M262. The type of viewfinder that the camera has. Without looking, apart from the lens detection options, I couldnt tell you whats in the menu at all. M262 can be more pleasing in use as lighter with longer lasting battery and a bit quieter than M240. I love the files the camera produces, the size and weight is just right and operationally it couldnt be much simpler. Quality over quantity. Weight savings from the M10 may be there, but with a Thumbs Up in the hot shoe, the M240 feels good and substantial in the hand.ISO setting. It depends on your needs. Im not loaded, but I do focus almost all my disposable income on this. The only shortcoming relating to the auto ISO function is that sometimes I feel like Id like to be able to see the ISO the camera is choosing on a shot by shot basis.

Kubix Festival Capacity, Articles L